Samuel Brosset vs Raphael Vaksmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Vaksmann's second serve performance has been notably inferior to Brosset's, with a success rate of 44.88% compared to Brosset's 49.51% over the past six months. This disparity offers valuable insights into potential match outcomes due to the high correlation between second serve effectiveness and match prediction accuracy. Additionally, Brosset's winning percentage in matches over the last year stands at 65.38% (W/L 17/9), dramatically higher than Vaksmann's 40% (W/L 8/12), indicating Brosset's superior recent form.

Analyzing return game statistics, Vaksmann shows a slight advantage in retrieving their opponent's second serve points, securing 46.55% compared to Brosset's 44.07%. Similarly, first serve return stats reveal Vaksmann's 27.17% is marginally better than Brosset's 25.23%, aligning with trends that often help identify the favored player in match predictions.

When faced with breakpoint situations, Vaksmann exhibits a marginally superior ability to save them, with a rate of 55.26% compared to Brosset's 54.88%. However, Vaksmann's breakpoint conversion rate is 39.34%, which, although higher than Brosset’s 35.71%, may not be sufficient to outweigh Brosset’s better overall performance record and ranking of recent opponents, who average a higher rank of 234.77 compared to Vaksmann's 319.85.

On the preferred surface, both players excel on clay. Vaksmann has a career win rate of 40% (W/L 4/6), whereas Brosset dominates with 61% (W/L 56/36). Indoor hard courts reveal a less favorable scenario for Vaksmann, with a mere 36% win rate (W/L 10/18), while Brosset also shows a reduced performance but maintains a respectable 51% win rate (W/L 24/23).

Regarding live predictions and betting in deciding sets, Brosset again displays a higher success rate at 60% across all matches, relative to Vaksmann's 57%. In the context of the event level, it’s crucial to consider that Vaksmann and Brosset predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Brosset outperforming with a 65.38% win rate compared to Vaksmann's 40%.

Factoring in the comparative statistics, Brosset emerges as the stronger contender in this matchup. Considering all aspects, from serve and return efficiency to opponent quality and surface adaptability, Brosset's consistent advantage suggests that they are the more likely victor in the upcoming match. Brosset’s superior performance metrics, particularly on their preferred surfaces and under pressure scenarios, lend a persuasive edge to their anticipated success.